Jason Pozner

Partner

Home / The Firm / Our Team / Jason Pozner

Jason A. Pozner

Partner

201-306-9044

jap@strikowsky.com

Jason Pozner focuses on insurance coverage and risk transfer. He advises and represents insurers writing coverage across various product lines, including liability, property, professional liability and environmental risks. His counselling has successfully guided high‑exposure coverage disputes across the United States and internationally. Jason undertakes all aspects of policy and claim analysis, negotiation, and, where required, litigation or arbitration through final determination or consensual resolution. He is well-versed in declaratory judgment actions in the state and federal courts of New York and New Jersey (and their respective appellate courts), and in the rendering of coverage opinions.

Selected Published Decisions

  • Arthur Vincent & Sons Constr., Inc. v. Century Sur. Ins. Co., 156 A.D.3d 853 (2d Dep’t 2017) — Enforcing excess policy provision within “other insurance” clause.
  • Bayswater Dev. LLC v. Admiral Ins. Co., 126 A.D.3d 490 (1st Dep’t 2015) — Pollution exclusion barred coverage for Chinese drywall claims.
  • Olin Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., 704 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2012) — Condition C “continuing coverage” required insurer to bear on-going losses for long‑tail environmental damage beginning during policy.
  • United States v. South Jersey Clothing Co., 976 F. Supp. 2d 577 (D.N.J. 2013) — Claimants permitted to proceed against insurers where they held a protected property interest.
  • Marolda Farms, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Ins. Co., 2012 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2609 (App. Div. Nov. 29, 2012) — State court lacked jurisdiction where federal court retained jurisdiction by consent decree.
  • W9/PHC Real Estate LP v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., 970 A.2d 382 (N.J. App. Div. 2009) — Competing 'other insurance' clauses (excess vs. pro‑rata); court applied excess clause rendering pro‑rata policy primary.
  • Hernandez v. M‑Indus., LLC, 11 A.3d 375 (N.J. App. Div. 2010) — Landowner owes no duty to protect an independent contractor from hazards created by the contractor’s own work.

Practices

  • Insurance Coverage & Bad Faith
  • Comprehensive General Liability (CGL)
  • Professional Liability (E&O) and Directors & Officers (D&O)
  • Excess & Umbrella Coverage
  • Cyber Liability and Technology E&O
  • Employment Practices Liability (EPL)
  • Pollution / Environmental Liability
  • Product Recall and Contaminated Product
  • Additional Insured & Risk Transfer
  • Abuse/Molestation Claims

Education

  • Seton Hall University School of Law, J.D., 2006
  • The George Washington University, B.A., Elliott School of International Affairs, 2002

Admissions

  • New Jersey, 2006
  • New York, 2007

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York

Selected Results

  • Obtained summary judgment relieving insurer of coverage for cleanup costs at a former manufacturing site based on the owned‑property exclusion.
  • Won summary judgment where insured’s construction errors damaged property; court found no coverage under CGL, Professional Liability, or Builder’s Risk policies.
  • Secured summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action seeking to reopen litigation over alleged mold‑related bodily injury.
  • Negotiated favorable settlement in an insurance coverage dispute arising from high‑profile litigation involving a publication of a purloined sex tape.
  • Achieved favorable settlement for insurer in a product recall claim concerning alleged contamination of a baby‑food product.
  • Led a team of coverage attorneys to obtain discovery and monitor trial in underlying multi‑billion‑dollar libel litigation, resulting in a favorable settlement by the insured’s carrier.
  • Member of a team handling a large educational institution’s coverage claims involving high‑profile sexual‑molestation allegations.
  • Conducted a comprehensive review of asbestos defense and settlement practices for a multi‑national client.
  • Coordinated multi‑national discovery in a declaratory‑judgment matter regarding cargo damage in Brazil (admiralty case pending in London), reaching a favorable settlement.

Publications

  • The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Grable & Sons v. Darue Engineering Does Not Resolve the Split Over Merrell Dow v. Thompson,” 2 Seton Hall Circuit Review 533 (2006).
  • “Preservation and E‑Discovery From a Litigation and Risk Management Perspective” (2007).
  • Bad Faith Compendium, Munich Reinsurance America (2008).
  • 50‑State Survey of Reservation of Rights Letters, Disclaimer Letters and Non‑Waiver Agreements, Munich Reinsurance America (2008).

Honors & Distinctions

  • Selected to Super Lawyers Rising Stars for Insurance Coverage, 2013–2019.

2023 © Strikowsky Drachman & Shapiro PLLC
Civil Litigators: Insurance Counselors

Legal Disclaimer  |  Design by NexFirm